Summary

This is a commercial summary lawsuit filed by Reproductores Avícolas, S.A. against Lisa, S.A. The dispute concerns alleged prescription of Lisa’s right to claim dividends. In 2024, BDT Investments Inc. sought to intervene as a third-party co-defendant (coadyuvante) in support of Lisa. The court admitted BDT, and Reproductores Avícolas challenged this through a revocatoria, which was denied.

Decisions

Twelfth Civil Court of First Instance
March 20th, 2024
Issues

Whether BDT Investments Inc. could intervene in the lawsuit as a third-party co-defendant supporting Lisa.

Ruling

The court recognized BDT’s legal representation and admitted it as a third-party co-defendant (coadyuvante), allowing it to join Lisa’s defense.

Effect

BDT formally entered the proceedings on Lisa’s side, with its offered evidence noted.

Order|Twelfth Civil CourtMarch 20th, 2024
Twelfth Civil Court of First Instance
April 19th, 2024
Issues

Reproductores Avícolas filed a revocatoria challenging BDT’s admission, arguing lack of certain interest, defective documentation, and tax issues.

Ruling

The court denied the revocatoria, holding that any objections regarding BDT’s interest or documentation must be decided together with the main case in the final judgment.

Effect

The March 20 ruling admitting BDT remained firm; BDT stayed as co-defendant.

Order|Twelfth Civil CourtApril 19th, 2024

Conclusion

The court confirmed BDT Investments Inc. as co-defendant supporting Lisa, rejecting Reproductores Avícolas’ challenge. The rulings ensure that Lisa benefits from BDT’s participation in its defense. Substantive issues about prescription of dividends remain pending for final judgment.