Caso Avícola Villalobos
  • Guatemala
  • Panama
  • Records

Case File

Exp. 556-99

Ordinary Lawsuit of High Value

Country
Panama
Group
Villamorey Dividend Recovery
Plaintiff
  • Villamorey, S.A.
Defendant
  • Lisa, S.A.

Documents

  1. Judgement 42-08Jul 11 2008
  2. Order 1624-08Oct 27 2008
  3. Official NoticeNov 25 2008
  4. Appeal RulingAug 28 2012
  5. Order 2277-2018Dec 5 2018
  6. Appeal RulingJul 12 2019
  7. Amparo 1022-19Jun 24 2020
  8. Order 1827-2020Dec 10 2020
  9. MotionFeb 10 2025
  10. MotionFeb 11 2025
  11. MotionMar 27 2025
  12. MotionApr 30 2025
Exp. 556-99
Download

Order 2277-2018

Eleventh Civil Court denies share auction and orders set-off against dividends retained by Villamorey

Issued on

Dec 5 2018

Issued by

11th Civil Court

DownloadPDF

Order No. 2277-2018 of the Eleventh Circuit Civil Court of Panama resolved the central dispute of the enforcement phase in the Ordinary Lawsuit of High Value: whether the $894,718.00 judgment against Lisa, S.A. under Sentence No. 42-08, as modified by the First Superior Court ruling of August 28, 2012, should be enforced through a share auction or through set-off against retained dividends. The court chose set-off, denying the auction and extinguishing the obligation without disturbing Lisa, S.A.'s shareholdings in the Avícola Villalobos group.

Competing Motions

Following the enforcement decree under Order No. 1723-16 of September 7, 2016, which elevated the sequestration to an attachment, the parties filed incompatible petitions. Villamorey, S.A., through its counsel Galindo, Arias & López, sought auction of Lisa, S.A.'s share certificates in the Guatemalan companies listed in the attachment order. Lisa, S.A. requested that the judgment be satisfied from dividends Villamorey had retained as judicial depositary since the sequestration decree of October 27, 2008.

Court's Analysis

Sufficiency of retained dividends. The judge found that dividends retained by Villamorey, S.A. since November 2008, placed at the court's disposal per the November 25, 2008 depositary acknowledgment, exceeded the enforceable amount of $894,718.00 by a substantial margin, rendering a share auction unnecessary.

Parallel BDT Investments, Inc. enforcement. The court took judicial notice of an enforcement proceeding in the Twelfth Circuit Civil Court: BDT Investments, Inc. v. Lisa, S.A., with an attachment of $19,184,680.00. Rather than obstructing the set-off, this circumstance supported it: Villamorey, S.A. held priority by virtue of its earlier precautionary measure, and satisfying its smaller debt through set-off would not prejudice BDT's position. The Twelfth Court would simply need to adjust its enforcement accordingly.

Practical effect. The set-off extinguished the judgment without liquidating Lisa, S.A.'s shareholdings in the seven Guatemalan subsidiaries of the Avícola Villalobos group, preserving assets whose value far exceeded the judgment amount.

Ruling

  • Denies the auction request for Lisa, S.A.'s share certificates in the companies listed in Order No. 1723-16 of September 7, 2016
  • Orders that the $894,718.00 enforcement amount be satisfied from dividends retained by Villamorey, S.A. in Guatemala or anywhere in the world
  • Orders communication to the Twelfth Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Panama that no outstanding balance remains available for the BDT Investments, Inc. enforcement against Lisa, S.A.
  • Recognizes Quiroz Govea Abogados as new counsel of record for Lisa, S.A.

Legal Basis

  • Articles 17 and 32 of the Constitution — due process guarantees and effective judicial protection
  • Article 1 of the Commercial Code — supplementary application of commercial law to corporate relationships
  • Articles 1043 and 1662 of the Civil Code — set-off as a mode of extinguishing obligations and the deposit regime
  • Article 1259 of the Judicial Code — judicial powers in the enforcement phase

Signatories

  • Lcda. María Leticia Cedeño Suira, Judge, Eleventh Circuit Civil Court of the First Judicial District of Panama
  • Lcda. Raquel Guzmán Fernández, Judicial Secretary
Next in case
First Superior Tribunal declines jurisdiction over appeal of dividend set-off order
Jul 12 2019