Denies Bosch's petition to impose costs on Lisa, S.A., upholding good-faith finding
Aug 21 2025
1st Superior Tribunal
The First Superior Tribunal of the First Judicial District of Panama denied the petition for cost modification filed by Galindo, Arias y López, counsel for Juan Luis Bosch Gutierrez, and upheld the exoneration of Lisa, S.A. from costs in the Summary Accounting Proceeding. The ruling, dated August 21, 2025, reaffirmed the position adopted in the July 9, 2025 appellate judgment, which had modified the first-instance Judgment No. 71 solely to exonerate Lisa, S.A. from costs.
Bosch's counsel grounded the petition in Article 999 of the Judicial Code, which permits a court to modify its cost determination within three days of notification. The petition argued that Lisa, S.A. lacked standing to sue (legitimación activa) and that Bosch was not the depositary of the shares or dividends claimed, negating his standing to be sued (legitimación pasiva). Counsel invoked Article 1071 of the Judicial Code, which mandates cost awards against the losing party as the default rule and enumerates circumstances under which good faith cannot be presumed, including when no evidence is offered to support the claims in the complaint.
The tribunal acknowledged the procedural viability of the petition, confirming it was filed within the three-day window under Article 999 of the Judicial Code, but rejected its substantive arguments. The panel held that, although Lisa, S.A.'s arguments did not succeed, it cannot be said that Lisa acted recklessly, abusively, or in bad faith. The tribunal emphasized that Lisa attempted to assert its rights in a complex legal context with documentary evidence that, while insufficient, was not entirely without foundation.
"Esta colegiatura se mantiene en el criterio en que la parte actora sostuvo su pretensión y aunque su argumentación no próspero, no puede afirmarse que haya actuado de forma temeraria, abusiva o de mala fe en este proceso." (Page 4)