Caso Avícola Villalobos
  • Guatemala
  • Panama
  • Records

Case File

Exp. 83573-21

Summary Accounting Lawsuit

Country
Panama
Group
Villamorey Dividend Recovery
Plaintiffs
  • Lisa, S.A.
  • BDT Investments Inc.
Defendant
  • Juan Luis Bosch Gutierrez

Documents

  1. Appeal RulingSep 30 2022
  2. Order 12Jan 5 2023
  3. Order E-127Jan 25 2023
  4. Order 712Apr 11 2023
  5. Letters Rogatory 29Jul 19 2023
  6. NotificationOct 4 2023
  7. MotionJan 10 2024
  8. Edict 246Jun 21 2024
  9. OrderAug 9 2024
  10. Order 18Jan 10 2025
  11. AppealFeb 19 2025
  12. AppealMar 13 2025
  13. EdictApr 7 2025
  14. Appeal RulingJul 9 2025
  15. MotionJul 21 2025
  16. Appeal RulingAug 21 2025
  17. Order AutoSep 12 2025
  18. Cassation AppealOct 20 2025
  19. Edict 1537Nov 24 2025
Exp. 83573-21
Download

Edict 1537

Supreme Court sets admissibility deadlines for Lisa's cassation

Issued on

Nov 24 2025

Issued by

Supreme Court

DownloadPDF

By resolution dated November 19, 2025, the First Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice placed on the docket the cassation appeal filed by Lisa, S.A. against Juan Luis Bosch Gutiérrez in the Summary Accounting Proceeding (Case File No. 83573-21). The resolution initiates the admissibility phase of the appeal, establishing a six-day period: the first three days for the opposing party to argue against admissibility, and the following three days for Lisa to reply.

Procedural Context

This edict is the Supreme Court's first action following Lisa's formal cassation brief on the merits filed on October 20, 2025. In that brief, Lisa challenged the July 9, 2025 ruling of the First Superior Tribunal, which upheld the dismissal of the accounting action on the grounds that Lisa lacked active standing due to its prior assignment of rights to BDT Investments Inc., and that Bosch lacked passive standing because he acted as Villamorey, S.A.'s representative rather than in his personal capacity. Lisa's cassation rests on two grounds: error of law in the assessment of evidence and direct violation by omission of substantive legal provisions, including the Tribunal's failure to rule on BDT's request to intervene as litisconsorte under Articles 612 and 835 of the Judicial Code.

Ruling

  • The Supreme Court placed the matter on the docket for a six-day admissibility briefing period.
  • Within the first three days, the opposing party (Bosch) must submit arguments on the admissibility of the cassation appeal.
  • Within the following three days, Lisa may file a reply to those arguments.

Signatories

  • Angela Russo de Cedeño, Magistrate
  • Sonia F. de Castroverde, Judicial Secretary